In the UK, the responsibilities and rights concerning tree ownership and boundary maintenance are precisely defined, providing a framework for resolving potential disputes between neighbours. Tree ownership is primarily determined by the location of the tree trunk; if the trunk stands entirely on one person's property, that individual is considered the tree's owner. This ownership carries the responsibility for the tree's maintenance and any damage it might cause.
Boundary responsibilities, similarly, are often determined by the property deeds, which should delineate who owns which boundary and who is responsible for its upkeep. In the absence of clear deeds, there are general presumptions - for instance, a fence where the posts are on one side is usually owned by the person on that side. This can have implications for trees growing near boundaries, as the tree owner is liable if their tree causes damage to a fence or property on the neighbouring side.
Both tree and boundary laws underscore the importance of understanding one's rights and responsibilities to prevent disputes. They encourage property owners to engage in open communication with their neighbours and to seek amicable resolutions or professional advice when needed.
Understanding one's legal rights concerning trees on private property goes beyond mere ownership; it encompasses a broad spectrum of responsibilities and protections that can significantly impact neighbourly relations and property management. This knowledge is crucial for preventing disputes, protecting one's property from potential damage, and ensuring compliance with local laws and regulations. Being aware of the legal framework allows homeowners to make informed decisions about tree maintenance, pruning, or removal activities that could affect their neighbours or the local environment. Furthermore, a clear understanding of legal obligations helps property owners avoid unintentional violations that could lead to costly penalties or legal disputes. In essence, staying informed about tree-related legal rights and responsibilities fosters a respectful and cooperative community, preventing conflicts, and promoting a harmonious and sustainable living environment. You could always get the opinion of a trusted tree surgeon and arborist in Nottingham if you are not sure.
Navigating the intricacies of tree ownership and boundary disputes necessitates a thorough understanding of both legal principles and the physical demarcations that define property boundaries. The first step in this process is accurately identifying the tree's ownership, which hinges largely on the location of the trunk in relation to property lines. In instances where a tree's trunk straddles a boundary line, ownership is shared, and thus, both parties bear responsibility for the tree's maintenance and any issues it may cause.
Another critical aspect involves the roots and branches of a tree. Even if a tree stands wholly within one property, roots and branches that extend beyond boundaries may present legal quandaries. In the UK, the owner of the tree is not automatically liable for damage caused by overreaching branches or encroaching roots, but neighbours have the right to prune branches or roots that intrude onto their property, within their boundary lines.
This delicate balance between rights and responsibilities underscores the importance of maintaining open lines of communication between neighbours and, when possible, reaching mutual agreements regarding the care and management of trees near property lines. Before taking any action, such as pruning or removing a tree, consulting with legal or arboricultural experts can help prevent disputes and ensure that actions are taken lawfully and considerately.
The interplay between tree ownership and boundary responsibilities often mirrors the broader dynamics of neighbourly relations; understanding and respecting these principles can lead to more harmonious living environments and the amicable resolution of potential disputes.
The legal framework governing tree maintenance and protection in the UK is comprehensive and designed to balance the interests of property owners with environmental conservation and public safety. Key elements of this framework include the Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs), Conservation Area restrictions, and the Common Law rights and obligations of property owners.
Tree Preservation Orders are legal protections implemented by local planning authorities to protect specific trees, groups of trees, or woodlands deemed to provide significant amenity benefits to the public. A TPO prohibits the cutting down, topping, lopping, uprooting, or otherwise wilful damaging of trees without the local planning authority's permission, thereby playing a pivotal role in safeguarding valuable tree cover.
In Conservation Areas, trees enjoy similar protections, and notice must be given to the local planning authority six weeks prior to carrying out any work on trees, providing the authority with an opportunity to evaluate and, if necessary, implement a TPO to prevent the work.
Beyond these specific protections, the Common Law imposes duties on tree owners to ensure their trees do not pose a danger to others. This includes a responsibility to regularly inspect and maintain trees, particularly those that could fall on neighbouring properties or public spaces. Failure to fulfil these obligations can result in liability for damages should the tree cause harm.
Understanding these laws and regulations is essential for property owners and managers in the UK. Compliance not only ensures the protection and preservation of the natural environment but also minimises legal risks associated with tree ownership and maintenance.
The Environmental Protection Act plays a significant role in the broader context of tree management and protection within the UK. This comprehensive legislation is designed to control and reduce pollution, but it also has implications for the management of trees, especially in terms of waste from tree maintenance and removal. Under this Act, property owners and tree managers must ensure that any waste generated from pruning, felling, or maintaining trees is disposed of responsibly, without harming the environment. This includes adhering to regulations on waste disposal to prevent any potential pollution or harm to wildlife and natural habitats. Furthermore, the Act encourages practices that contribute to environmental conservation, including the planting and nurturing of trees as a way to combat pollution and enhance urban and rural landscapes. By integrating the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act with the specific laws governing tree preservation and maintenance, a comprehensive approach to environmental stewardship and sustainable property management is fostered, underscoring the interconnected nature of legal compliance and environmental responsibility.
The Town and Country Planning Act serves as a foundational pillar in the UK's legislative framework for environmental preservation, with a particular focus on Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs). Under this Act, local planning authorities are empowered to make TPOs to protect trees that contribute to the aesthetics of a locality or are of cultural, historical, or environmental significance. TPOs can cover individual trees, groups of trees, or woodlands, and prohibit the cutting down, topping, lopping, uprooting, or willful destruction of trees without explicit permission from the local planning authority.
This legislation aims to strike a balance between the right of property owners to manage their land and the broader community interest in preserving natural beauty and environmental health. When a TPO is in place, any proposed work on a protected tree must be formally applied for and approved, ensuring that actions taken are in the public interest and do not detrimentally affect the local environment. The Act not only highlights the importance of trees in urban and rural settings but also establishes a legal recourse to protect them, reflecting a commitment to environmental sustainability and heritage conservation.
The Anti-social Behaviour Act introduces crucial legislation concerning the management of high hedges, commonly referred to as the High Hedges legislation. This legislation was specifically designed to address disputes between neighbours over hedges that are considered to be too tall and, as a result, cause issues such as reduced light access or enjoyment of a property. It provides a formal mechanism for individuals to seek a resolution when dialogue between neighbours fails. Under this act, local authorities are given the power to intervene in disputes concerning high hedges, allowing them to assess the situation and, if deemed necessary, order the hedge owner to take action to reduce the hedge's height to an acceptable level.
The process is initiated when a complaint is lodged with the local council, followed by an investigation to determine the hedge’s impact on the complainant's property and quality of life. After reviewing the case, the council can issue a formal notice to the hedge owner, outlining required actions within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply with such notices can lead to fines and further legal action. This legislation emphasizes the importance of balancing individual property rights with ensuring that all residents can enjoy their property without undue interference from neighbouring vegetation. It further underscores the role of local authorities in mediating conflicts between residents, and promoting harmony within communities while also protecting the rights and well-being of individuals.
The rights and obligations of tree owners in the UK are framed within a complex legal landscape that emphasizes both the preservation of natural beauty and the responsibility of owners to ensure their trees do not pose a risk to others. On one hand, tree owners have the right to plant, prune, and manage their trees as they see fit, provided their actions do not contravene any specific legal protections like Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) or local planning regulations. This autonomy allows owners to shape their landscapes, contribute to local biodiversity, and enjoy the aesthetic and environmental benefits that trees provide.
On the other hand, obligations loom equally as significant. Tree owners are legally bound to ensure that their trees do not present a danger to the public. This includes regular inspections and maintenance work to prevent potential hazards, such as falling branches or trees. Where a tree’s condition might pose a risk, the owner is required to take reasonable actions to mitigate that risk, which may involve pruning or, in some instances, removal of the tree.
Furthermore, tree owners must be mindful of their neighbours and the potential impact of their trees on adjoining properties. The High Hedges legislation specifically addresses this by offering a formal recourse for disputes arising from the growth of hedges that adversely affect neighbouring properties, highlighting the balance between individual property rights and community welfare.
In essence, while tree ownership offers the potential to enhance personal and communal environments, it carries with it a suite of responsibilities aimed at ensuring public safety, preserving community harmony, and protecting the natural landscape. Compliance with these duties not only minimises legal risks but also contributes to a sustainably managed and mutually beneficial living environment.
The emphasis on well-being is a pivotal aspect of environmental law, extending beyond the mere preservation of flora and architecture to address the health and satisfaction of communities. This holistic approach recognises that individuals' quality of life is deeply intertwined with their surroundings. Green spaces, protected trees, and well-managed hedges not only contribute to the aesthetic and environmental value of an area but also play a significant role in mental and physical well-being. Access to natural beauty and well-maintained landscapes fosters a sense of peace, promotes physical activity, and can significantly reduce stress levels, underscoring the broader societal benefits of such environmental policies. Therefore, by safeguarding our natural and built environments, the law indirectly nurtures community well-being, highlighting the intricate connection between legal frameworks and public health.
Local authorities play a crucial role in the enforcement and application of environmental laws, including those concerning Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs), High Hedges, and overall landscape management. Their involvement typically begins when issues arise that require mediation between private interests and public welfare or when there's a need to ensure compliance with existing legal frameworks.
When an individual submits a complaint regarding a protected tree or a high hedge, or when there's suspected non-compliance with TPOs, local authorities step in to assess the situation. They conduct investigations to understand the nature of the complaint, the impact on the local environment and community, and whether any laws or regulations have been violated. This process may involve site visits, consultations with environmental experts, and discussions with both the complainant and the property owner involved.
Following this assessment, local authorities can take various actions depending on the findings. In the case of high hedges, for example, they might issue a formal notice to the hedge owner, dictating the measures that need to be taken and within what timeframe. For issues concerning TPOs, they may enforce pruning, maintenance, or, in some cases, the removal of trees if they're deemed unsafe or if they adversely affect the local environment and community.
Local authorities also provide guidance and support to tree and hedge owners to help them understand their responsibilities and how to comply with laws. This proactive approach aims to prevent disputes and non-compliance, fostering a harmonious balance between private interests and public environmental goals. Through their involvement, local authorities ensure that the legal frameworks designed to protect our natural and built environments are effectively implemented, thereby promoting the well-being of communities and the sustainability of local ecosystems.
When dealing with the issue of overhanging branches and encroaching roots, the legal standing is quite clear in most jurisdictions. Property owners possess the right to maintain the integrity of their property lines and are therefore entitled to trim branches and roots that encroach onto their property from a neighbour's trees. This right is subject to the condition that the trimming does not harm the overall health and viability of the tree. In essence, while property owners can take action to protect their property, they must do so in a manner that is considerate of the tree's well-being and survival.
Further, disputes over overhanging branches and encroaching roots often emphasize the importance of communication and negotiation between neighbours before taking any legal or physical action. Ideally, parties should reach an amicable agreement on how best to address the situation, respecting both the property rights and the environmental value trees add to communities. When disputes escalate, local authorities or legal counsel may need to intervene to ensure the actions taken are in compliance with local laws and regulations, including any protective orders that may be in place for specific trees.
Under UK law, the handling of encroaching roots is a matter taken with significant seriousness due to the potential for property damage and the impact on neighbour relations. The principle is similar to that for overhanging branches; property owners have the right to remove roots that extend into their property. However, there are complexities given the potential for serious harm to the tree and, consequently, to neighbourly relations and local biodiversity.
Legally, if a tree is protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or is located within a conservation area, the owner must obtain permission from the local authority before undertaking any action that could affect the tree's health, including the cutting of encroaching roots. Absent such protections, while property owners are entitled to cut back roots that have encroached onto their property, they must do so in a manner that does not unlawfully damage the neighbour's tree. Unlawful damage could lead to claims under the tort of negligence or nuisance.
Property owners are advised to seek professional advice from an arboriculturist or tree surgeon before cutting roots, to ensure that their actions will not harm the tree. Additionally, open communication with the tree-owning neighbour is encouraged to resolve the issue amicably and to avoid potential legal disputes. In instances where property damage has occurred due to encroaching roots, property owners may seek compensation through civil proceedings, though this is generally seen as a last resort after all attempts at amicable resolution have failed.
The concept of "self-help" within legal boundaries is an important consideration for property owners facing issues with overhanging branches and encroaching roots. This principle allows individuals to take direct action to remedy a situation without resorting to legal proceedings, provided that such actions are within the framework of the law. In the context of property disputes, self-help can include trimming overhanging branches or encroaching roots that cross into one's property line. However, it is crucial that any self-help measures are conducted responsibly and with respect for the health of the tree and the rights of the tree owner.
Exercising self-help requires a careful balance between protecting one's property and avoiding unnecessary harm to the tree or surrounding environment. Legal guidelines stipulate that any action taken must not damage the tree's health or survival prospects. Thus, while self-help empowers property owners to address immediate concerns, it also imposes a duty of care towards the broader ecosystem. Ensuring compliance with local regulations, especially in cases involving protected trees or conservation areas, is essential to avoid legal repercussions. In summary, while the concept of self-help offers a pragmatic approach to resolving certain disputes, it demands mindfulness of legal obligations and environmental stewardship.
The importance of open communication between neighbours cannot be overstated when it comes to addressing issues of overhanging branches and encroaching roots. Before resorting to legal measures or physical alterations, a dialogue between the affected parties can often lead to a mutual understanding and a more amicable resolution. Communication fosters a sense of community and can prevent the escalation of disputes into contentious legal battles. It enables neighbours to express their concerns, share their intentions, and work together to find solutions that respect both the property rights and the environmental value that trees contribute to the neighbourhood. In many cases, a simple conversation can help clarify misunderstandings, reveal shared interests, and strengthen neighbourly bonds, ensuring that actions taken are considerate of all parties involved and the local ecosystem. This approach not only helps in resolving the immediate issue at hand but also promotes a collaborative and respectful community atmosphere, laying the groundwork for positive interactions in the future.
When tree maintenance has the potential to affect neighbouring property, it is both a legal and courteous requirement to seek permission before proceeding. This action not only aligns with legal obligations, particularly in the context of trees protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or located in conservation areas, but also helps to maintain harmonious relationships between neighbours. Obtaining consent is a step that acknowledges the balance between property rights and the shared interest in the local environment's health and appearance.
Before any work begins, it is advised to have a clear and open discussion with the neighbouring property owner, explaining the nature of the maintenance work, its necessity, and how it will be carried out to minimize any adverse effects on their property or the tree itself. Providing detailed information and perhaps even seeking the advice or services of a professional arborist together can demonstrate goodwill and a commitment to maintaining the tree's health and the property's aesthetic value.
In instances where a tree is under legal protection, the procedural steps invariably include applying to the local council for permission, a process that should be initiated well in advance of the planned maintenance work. This application should detail the work's specifics and include an assessment from a qualified arborist to justify the proposed actions.
By following these steps—open communication, seeking mutual agreement, and adhering to local regulations—property owners can ensure that tree maintenance work proceeds smoothly, with respect for legal constraints and the values of the community.
Mediation plays a pivotal role in resolving disputes over overhanging branches and encroaching roots, serving as a bridge towards understanding and cooperation between conflicting parties. This alternative dispute resolution method brings neighbours together with an impartial third party, the mediator, who facilitates dialogue and negotiation to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Unlike the adversarial nature of court proceedings, mediation focuses on collaboration, aiming to understand the needs and interests of both parties without assigning blame or liability.
The process encourages open communication, allows for creative solutions, and can preserve or even improve neighbourly relations by fostering a spirit of compromise and mutual respect. Furthermore, mediation can provide a more time-efficient and cost-effective resolution compared to traditional legal avenues. By resorting to mediation, neighbours can find a tailored resolution that respects the rights and concerns of each party, ensures the health and safety of the trees involved, and upholds the community's environmental values. This not only resolves the immediate issue at hand but also sets a positive precedent for handling future disputes.
Discovering that a neighbour has cut your tree without permission can be both shocking and upsetting. It's important to address the situation calmly and methodically. The following steps can guide you through the initial phase of dealing with such an incident:
Document the Damage: Take clear, dated photographs of the damage to your tree. This can serve as evidence in any potential legal proceedings or insurance claims.
Contact the Neighbour: Approach your neighbour to discuss the incident. It's possible that the cutting was unintentional or the result of a misunderstanding. A calm, constructive conversation can sometimes resolve the issue without further action.
Consult a Professional Arborist: Have an arborist assess the damage to the tree. They can provide a professional evaluation of the harm and an estimate for remediation or replacement. This assessment will be valuable for insurance or legal purposes.
Review Local Laws and Ordinances: Familiarise yourself with local regulations regarding trees and property rights. Understanding the legal context can help you assess the options available to you.
Report the Incident: If the tree is protected under a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or if local laws have been violated, report the incident to your local council or relevant governmental body. They can advise on regulatory steps and may initiate enforcement actions.
Seek Legal Advice: Consider consulting a solicitor who specializes in property or environmental law. They can offer specific advice based on your situation, including whether you have grounds for a civil lawsuit for damages.
Avoid Retaliatory Actions: While it may be tempting to respond to the cutting with immediate action against your neighbour, such actions can complicate legal proceedings and negatively affect outcomes.
Taking these steps promptly after discovering your tree has been cut without permission can protect your legal rights, potentially lead to compensation for damages, and help ensure the health of your remaining trees and property.
Proper documentation is crucial when dealing with the unauthorized cutting of your tree. This documentation not only supports your claim but can also help in the resolution process, whether it's through negotiation, mediation, or legal action. Here’s how to effectively document the incident:
Photographic Evidence: Take comprehensive photographs of the tree damage from multiple angles. Ensure these photos are timestamped if possible, or note the date and time they were taken. Also, capture any other relevant surroundings that might provide context to the situation, like the position of the tree in relation to property lines.
Written Record: Create a detailed written account of the incident as soon as possible. Include dates, times, and a description of the damage. Note any conversations or interactions you had with your neighbour regarding the tree before and after the incident occurred.
Witness Statements: If there were any witnesses to the cutting or any relevant conversations between you and your neighbour, ask them to provide a written statement of what they saw or heard.
Professional Assessment: Obtain a detailed report from a certified arborist or tree specialist that includes an assessment of the damage, the condition of the tree before and after the incident, and any professional recommendations for rectifying the damage. This assessment should also estimate the cost of repairs or replacement.
Correspondence Record: Keep records of all communications related to the incident, including emails, texts, or letters between you and your neighbour, or any communications with local authorities, legal advisors, or arborists.
Research and Compile Background Information: Gather any previous property surveys, photographs, or records that establish the tree's location and health status before the incident. This might include aerial photos, property plans, or landscape records.
By meticulously documenting the incident and all related interactions, you're building a comprehensive evidence base. This not only aids in the resolution process but also ensures you're prepared for any necessary legal steps to seek remedy or compensation for the unauthorized tree cutting.
When faced with the unauthorised cutting of your tree by a neighbour, seeking legal advice is a crucial step in understanding your rights and potential remedies. A solicitor specializing in property or environmental law can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation. Here are the potential legal remedies that may be available to you:
Compensation for Damages: If it's determined that the cutting of your tree was unlawful, you may be entitled to compensation. This can cover the cost of replacing the tree, any decrease in property value, and possibly additional damages for the loss of enjoyment of your property.
Injunction: In some cases, you might be able to obtain an injunction against your neighbour. This legal order can prevent further damage to your trees or property and can be a powerful tool in preventing future incidents.
Mediation: While not strictly a legal remedy, mediation can be an effective means to resolve disputes without resorting to litigation. A neutral third party can help both sides reach a mutually agreeable solution, potentially saving time, money, and stress.
Legal Action: If other efforts fail, taking legal action through the courts may be necessary. This could result in a judgment for damages or other legal orders against the person who cut your tree without permission.
It's important to note that the specific remedies available will depend on local laws and the specific circumstances of the case. Early consultation with a legal professional can help you understand the best course of action and how to prepare if legal action is necessary. Remember, timely action can be crucial in such disputes, as it can affect the options and remedies available to you.
Civil remedies provide a pathway for individuals who have experienced the unauthorized cutting of their tree to seek justice and compensation. These remedies fall within the realm of civil law and can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction, the specifics of the case, and the extent of the damages incurred. Generally, they may include:
Compensatory Damages: These are intended to compensate the plaintiff for the actual loss or injury suffered. In the context of tree cutting, this might include the cost of tree replacement, treatment, or even an estimation of the loss in property value due to the absence of the tree.
Punitive Damages: Although less common in cases of tree cutting, punitive damages may be awarded in extreme cases where the defendant’s actions are found to be willfully negligent or malicious. The purpose of these damages is not just to compensate the victim but also to punish the offender and deter similar actions in the future.
Specific Performance: This legal remedy may be sought in situations where monetary compensation is deemed insufficient to rectify the harm done. An order of specific performance would compel the defendant to undertake specific actions, such as planting replacement trees of a similar age and type, to directly address the loss incurred.
Restitution: In some cases, the court may order the defendant to provide restitution, effectively restoring the situation to as close as possible to what it was before the incident occurred. This could involve financial restitution or specific actions similar to specific performance.
Injunctive Relief: This preventive measure can be crucial for ongoing disputes or to prevent further harm. An injunction may prohibit the neighbour from conducting any more potentially harmful actions to the remaining trees or property.
Civil remedies thus provide a spectrum of options for individuals seeking redress for the unauthorised cutting of trees. Each case's specific remedy or combination of remedies will depend on local laws, the severity of the infraction, and the evidence presented.
In instances where the unauthorised cutting involves a tree that is protected by law—due to its age, species, location within a conservation area, or status as a significant community landmark—criminal charges may be pursued. Protected trees are often covered under specific local, regional, or national environmental protection laws, which aim to conserve biodiversity, heritage, and the aesthetic value of natural landscapes. When a person intentionally or negligently violates these laws by cutting down or damaging a protected tree, they may face criminal penalties. These can include hefty fines, community service, or even imprisonment, depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offence.
Law enforcement and environmental protection agencies typically handle the investigation and prosecution of such cases. For property owners or community members who witness the unauthorized removal or damage of protected trees, it's essential to report the incident promptly to the appropriate authorities. Documenting the incident thoroughly and providing any evidence collected can support the investigation and contribute to the enforcement of environmental protection laws. This legal avenue serves not only as a remedy for the immediate parties affected but also as a deterrent against future harm to protected natural resources.
Nottingham, known for its rich history and green landscapes, has seen its share of legal disputes over unauthorised tree cutting. One notable case involved the removal of centuries-old oak trees in Sherwood Forest, an act that not only outraged the community but also led to significant legal repercussions. The offender was found guilty of violating local conservation laws and was ordered to pay substantial fines, reflecting the trees' environmental and cultural value.
Another case in the area centred around a private property owner in the West Bridgford suburb who, without obtaining the necessary permissions, cut down several mature trees that were subject to a Tree Preservation Order (TPO). The legal proceedings concluded with the court imposing a hefty fine on the property owner, alongside a mandate to plant new trees as a form of restitution. This case highlights the enforcement of TPOs and the serious consequences of non-compliance.
These examples underscore the importance of adhering to local and national regulations concerning tree preservation. They also illustrate the legal system's role in addressing environmental violations and serving justice, reinforcing the principle that the unauthorised destruction of natural resources is subject to severe penalties.
The aforementioned case studies from Nottingham offer critical insights into the prevailing attitudes and legal frameworks surrounding environmental protection and tree preservation. One key lesson is the paramount importance of awareness and compliance with local regulations, including Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) and conservation laws. These cases underscore the necessity for individuals and entities to familiarise themselves with and adhere to the legal requirements before undertaking any actions that could impact trees and natural landscapes.
Another lesson is the considerable weight that the legal system places on the conservation of natural resources, as reflected in the penalties imposed for unauthorised tree cutting. This demonstrates a broader commitment to preserving biodiversity, heritage, and the aesthetic integrity of landscapes, signalling to the public and potential offenders that such violations are taken seriously and attract significant consequences.
Furthermore, these cases highlight the role of the community and concerned citizens in safeguarding their environment. Public vigilance and willingness to report violations can play a crucial role in the enforcement of environmental protections and can assist in holding offenders accountable for their actions.
In terms of current legal standings, these lessons reinforce the evolving legal landscape that increasingly prioritises environmental conservation. They suggest a continued trend towards stricter enforcement of existing laws and potentially, the introduction of new regulations aimed at further safeguarding natural resources. Legal professionals, policymakers, and the public must remain informed and engaged with these developments to ensure the continued protection of the environment for future generations.
Any more questions neighbour's cutting trees without your permission in Nottingham or Derby, please give us a call, as we offer a free Initial consultation to all our customers. We are open for business 24/7
Nottingham Tree Surgery & Arborist Services
O115-824-3203
or
01332-327311